MCP Auth is here
Drop-in OAuth for your MCP Servers
Learn more

Token vault: Why it's critical for AI agent workflows

Srinivas Karre
Founding Engineer

Consider a common agent setup: it reads your Google Calendar to check for upcoming meetings, updates your Slack status to “In a meeting,” and logs notes to Notion. It runs entirely in the cloud, triggered by events, with no user intervention required. Everything works until it tries to authenticate with these services using OAuth and OpenID Connect flows.

Each external service uses its own authentication method, including OAuth flows, OpenID Connect, API keys, or token-based credentials, and nearly all of them assume the presence of an interactive user. But headless agents run in serverless environments or background jobs. These agents don’t have browsers. They can’t complete redirect flows. Worse, they have no secure place to persist credentials.

This forces developers into fragile workarounds, such as hardcoding tokens, injecting secrets through environment variables, or sharing long-lived credentials across agents. These patterns create significant risks, secrets become exposed, tokens expire without notice, and there’s no access visibility or permission separation.

The result is a growing operational and security gap: agents are ready to scale, but their credential management is stuck in a user-centric infrastructure.

The solution is to externalize authentication entirely. A token vault provides a centralized layer where credentials can be securely stored, refreshed, scoped, and audited, allowing agents to request precisely what they need, when they need it, without storing secrets locally or handling authentication flows themselves.

In the rest of this guide, you’ll learn what a token vault is, how it works, why traditional credential handling breaks down in agent workflows, and how to implement a vault-backed authentication layer that scales.

What is a token vault?

A token vault is a secure, centralized service for managing authentication credentials used by AI agents. Instead of embedding secrets directly into each agent, the vault acts as a single source of truth for storing, retrieving, and rotating credentials. Examples of token service providers include general-purpose tools, such as HashiCorp Vault, and agent-first systems, like Scalekit Agent Connect, which broker credentials on demand.

Think of it as a password manager, built not for humans, but for autonomous software.

Core functions of a token vault

A well-designed token vault does more than just store secrets. It becomes the backbone of how agents securely authenticate and operate across services.

Here are the four core capabilities that define an effective token vault:

Core functions of a token vault
  1. Credential storage: OAuth tokens, refresh tokens, API keys, payment tokens, and service credentials are stored securely in a centralized token store with encryption at rest.
  2. Credential retrieval: Agents make authenticated requests to the vault when they need a token, rather than storing secrets locally.
  3. Credential rotation: The vault handles token refresh (e.g., with OAuth refresh tokens) automatically, outside of the agent’s logic.
  4. Auditing and access control: All access is logged. Admins can control which agents can access which credentials, at what scope, and at what frequency.

How vaults replace static tokens

Vault-backed systems replace static tokens with dynamic, policy-controlled access. Here’s how they compare.

Feature
Traditional agent setup
Vault-based setup
Token location
Hardcoded or in environment variables
Stored securely in a centralized vault or token store
Token lifecycle
Static, needs manual refresh
Automatically rotated by the vault
Access permissions
Custom logic (if any)
Role-based, enforced per credential
Observability
No tracking or logging
Full audit trail for every request
Deployment overhead
Tokens are provisioned manually for each agent
Agents fetch what they need dynamically

Example: Agent requesting a credential from a vault API (generic example)

This is a simplified, framework-agnostic example that shows how an agent might request a scoped token from a custom token service provider. The actual implementation will vary depending on the vault system (e.g., HashiCorp Vault, Scalekit Agent Connect, or other OpenID Connect-compatible solutions):

const fetch = require('node-fetch'); async function getSlackToken(agentId, vaultUrl, vaultToken) { const response = await fetch(`${vaultUrl}/v1/agents/${agentId}/credentials/slack`, { headers: { 'Authorization': `Bearer ${vaultToken}` } }); if (!response.ok) { throw new Error(`Failed to fetch token: ${response.statusText}`); } const data = await response.json(); return data.access_token; }

This removes the need for the agent to ever hold or refresh long-lived secrets. The agent just asks the vault when it needs access, keeping authentication decoupled from application logic.

What is traditional credential management?

Traditional credential management refers to the standard patterns developers use to store and provide authentication credentials, like API keys, OAuth tokens, and service secrets, to software applications. This often involves:

  • Hardcoding credentials directly into source code
  • Injecting secrets via environment variables
  • Using shared service accounts or static tokens
  • Manually refreshing and rotating tokens
  • Configuring one-time credentials per service or agent

These patterns were designed for human-managed applications, not autonomous, headless agents that act independently in dynamic environments.

Why traditional credential management fails for agents

Most authentication systems are designed for users, not autonomous software, and expect social and enterprise identity providers to handle interactive auth method flows. This mismatch creates fundamental problems when applied to autonomous agents.

OAuth requires a user in the loop

OAuth2, widely used across APIs like Google, Slack, and Microsoft, assumes there’s a human present to complete a login. Redirects, approval screens, and browser flows are all part of the design. But agents don’t have browsers. They can’t click buttons or grant scopes. This makes standard OAuth integration incompatible out of the box.

Storing long-lived credentials is a security risk

Developers often resort to hardcoded access tokens, static API keys, or refresh tokens stored in environment variables to bypass interactive authentication flows. These secrets are fragile and can easily be leaked. If the agent is compromised, all connected services are also compromised. Worse, secrets may be shared across multiple agents or repos without proper revocation or rotation.

Manual credential management doesn’t scale

Maintaining a consistent and secure credential strategy becomes overwhelming in systems with multiple agents and services. For example, even a simple calendar-to-Slack agent ultimately requires multiple tokens, refresh logic, and error handling across both OAuth and static keys.

  • Each agent needs different tokens, scopes, and lifespans
  • Refresh logic is duplicated or inconsistent across agents
  • Revoking or updating credentials requires code changes or redeployment

Credential sprawl turns agent authentication into an operational bottleneck.

Developers are already struggling with this

One Reddit user summarized the problem succinctly in a recent thread:

Reddit post on how to handle access controls for your AI agents

Their concern? That agents either use full-access user credentials or overprivileged service accounts, with no clean way to scope or audit their access. As they put it, “Enforcing security at the agent layer is inherently risky because of the probabilistic nature of agents.”

That’s exactly the kind of uncontrolled sprawl that token vaults are designed to fix.

No audit trail, no control

Storing tokens inside agent code or configs offers no visibility. There’s no way to track which agent used what credential, when, or how. That becomes a compliance risk, especially in regulated environments, and makes incident response nearly impossible when something goes wrong.

How token vaults solve the agent authentication problem

Token vaults act like a credential concierge for agents. Instead of agents storing, refreshing, and securing credentials themselves, they request them from a centralized, secure service when needed, just like a valet hands you your keys only when it’s time to drive.

This eliminates the need for agents to carry secrets, refresh tokens, or deal with login flows. Developers can keep agent code clean and stateless, with all credential handling abstracted behind a consistent API call.

Centralized credential management

Think of a token vault like a secure locker room for secrets. Instead of handing each agent its own personal locker (and hoping it doesn’t lose the key), you centralize all the keys in one place, under supervision, encrypted, and access-controlled.

The token vault acts as a token store where all service credentials, OAuth tokens, API keys, refresh tokens, and even payment tokens are held securely. Each agent checks in to request the right key at the right time, rather than carrying secrets around.

This eliminates:

  • Secret duplication across agents
  • Insecure storage practices
  • Ad hoc implementations

Access to the vault is governed by well-defined auth methods (e.g., JWTs, client credentials), and all secrets are encrypted at rest. Only verified agents can fetch credentials that they are explicitly allowed to use.

Secure agent authentication

Vault-based authentication is easy to implement with just an HTTP request. Agents don’t need a browser, a login screen, or human involvement. They use automation-friendly auth methods like static credentials, signed JWTs, or mTLS to identify themselves and request tokens.

Here’s a working example using a bearer token to fetch a Slack credential:

const fetch = require('node-fetch'); async function getSlackToken(agentId, vaultUrl, vaultToken) { const res = await fetch(`${vaultUrl}/v1/agents/${agentId}/credentials/slack`, { headers: { 'Authorization': `Bearer ${vaultToken}` } }); if (!res.ok) throw new Error('Failed to fetch credential'); const data = await res.json(); return data.access_token; }

You can implement this in any Node.js agent in under 10 minutes. Just replace agentId, vaultUrl, and vaultToken with your actual values. This pattern works for any third-party API that requires a token, from Slack and Notion to payment processors, without the agent having to store or refresh secrets locally.

Automated credential rotation

Token vaults can automatically refresh credentials—like OAuth access tokens—using stored refresh tokens. This offloads the entire expiration and renewal logic away from the agent. The agent doesn’t track expiry or re-authenticate. It simply requests a valid token when needed, and the vault guarantees that what it returns is always fresh.

This flow is typically handled by a background scheduler process that rotates tokens on a fixed interval. Here's how the rotation process works:

Explaining automated credential rotation

How token rotation works: 

  1. Scheduler triggers the rotation job: A background scheduler (cron job, task runner, etc.) periodically initiates the rotation process.
  2. Vault uses stored refresh token: The vault sends a request to the OAuth provider (e.g., Google, Slack) using the refresh token previously obtained during the OAuth flow.
  3. OAuth provider returns a new access token: The provider validates the refresh token and returns a new access token (sometimes also a new refresh token, depending on the provider).
  4. Vault stores the new token securely: The vault overwrites the old access token in its token store with the fresh one. This ensures that any subsequent agent requests always receive a valid token.
  5. Agents remain stateless and unaware: Since the vault handles rotation behind the scenes, the agent doesn’t know or care when the token expires; it just asks for a token and gets a valid one every time.

For example, a vault might periodically refresh a Google token behind the scenes:

# Example: internal vault refresh process (pseudo-shell) refresh_token() { new_token=$(curl -X POST https://oauth2.googleapis.com/token \ -d client_id=$CLIENT_ID \ -d client_secret=$CLIENT_SECRET \ -d refresh_token=$REFRESH_TOKEN \ -d grant_type=refresh_token) store_in_vault $new_token }

This makes credential handling fully automatic and scalable across hundreds of agents, no more scattered refresh logic or expired tokens breaking production workflows.

Fine-grained permission control

A robust token vault doesn’t just store credentials; it controls who gets access to what. Access policies define exactly which agents can request which credentials and at what level of scope. This enables the separation of responsibilities across workflows and limits the blast radius if any single agent is compromised.

Take the example below. The policy grants agent-42 permission to access two credentials: a read-only Slack token and a calendar token scoped only to read event data.

Example policy structure:

{ "agent_id": "agent-42", "allowed_credentials": ["slack:read", "calendar:events.readonly"] }

When the agent requests access to a credential, the vault first checks this policy. If the request matches one of the allowed scopes, the vault returns a token limited to that scope. If not, it rejects the request.

What happens when an AI agent requests credentials from a vault

The diagram below illustrates this flow. The agent requests a calendar:events.readonly token. The vault checks the agent's policy. If approved, it returns a scoped token. If not, the agent receives an authorization error.

By handling access logic centrally, rather than within each agent, you reduce duplication, enforce least-privilege access, and establish a clear audit trail of every token request.

Token vault in practice

A typical workflow helps illustrate how a token vault works in practice: an AI agent needs to sync a user’s Google Calendar events and update their Slack status based on upcoming meetings.

Step-by-step workflow with a vault

1. Initial authorization flow (One-time, human-initiated): To grant agents access to third-party APIs, the user completes a one-time OAuth flow via a browser. The vault handles this interaction, exchanging the auth code, receiving tokens, and securely storing them tied to the user-agent pair.

The diagram below shows how the vault intermediates between the user and the OAuth provider to complete and store credentials:

how the vault intermediates between the user and the OAuth provider

2. Credentials stored in the vault: The vault now holds a valid Google token (with a refresh token) and a Slack token scoped to update presence. Tokens are encrypted and tied to a specific user-agent relationship.

3. Agent requests access during execution: When the agent runs, it fetches credentials directly from the vault in real time. Tokens are never stored locally; instead, they’re used once and discarded after the task completes.

The flow below shows how an agent authenticates with the vault, receives a scoped token, uses it to call an external API (like updating a Slack status), and then discards it after use:

how an agent authenticates with the vault, receives a scoped token, uses it to call an external API, and then discards it after use

4. Vault returns scoped token: The vault authenticates the agent, checks its permissions, and returns a short-lived, scoped token (e.g., only for reading calendar events or updating presence, not sending messages).

5. Agent executes workflow: With the valid token, the agent reads the calendar, determines when the user is in a meeting, and updates Slack status accordingly. Once done, the token is discarded from memory.

Implementation overview

The vault is usually implemented as a service or deployed self-hosted, or offered as part of a platform, and includes a secure API. It is integrated with the agent through the HTTPS protocol to bearer tokens, signed tokens, or mutual TLS.

For example, an agent might retrieve a calendar credential like this:

const fetch = require('node-fetch'); async function getCalendarToken(agentId, vaultUrl, vaultToken) { const res = await fetch(`${vaultUrl}/v1/agents/${agentId}/credentials/google-calendar`, { headers: { 'Authorization': `Bearer ${vaultToken}` } }); const data = await res.json(); return data.access_token; }

The agent never handles refresh logic or long-term secret storage; it delegates that entirely to the vault.

Integration patterns

There are several ways agents connect to a vault system, depending on the architecture:

  • Direct API access: The agent sends authenticated HTTP requests directly to the vault at runtime.
  • Sidecar process: In some deployments, a lightweight sidecar runs next to the agent. It handles all interactions with the vault, authenticating, retrieving tokens, and injecting them securely into the agent’s runtime. This allows agents to stay fully stateless while offloading credential logic to a dedicated helper process.
  • SDK integration: The vault provides a language-specific SDK that abstracts the API calls and handles token caching, retries, and refresh internally.

These patterns allow vault-based auth to integrate seamlessly with existing agent infrastructure, whether deployed on containers, functions, or edge nodes.

Real-world tools

Several platforms have emerged to solve this exact problem:

  • Composio.dev: Simplifies OAuth flows and secret handling for developer tooling.
  • Arcade.dev: Provides vault-backed credential access optimized for LLM agents.
  • Other emerging solutions: Tailored toward multi-agent orchestration, credential scoping, and managed access.

In all these setups, the core idea remains: agents don’t store credentials, they request them securely, when needed, from a vault that handles everything else.

Key benefits for agent development

Token vaults do more than just secure credentials; they simplify the entire agent development lifecycle. From reducing security risks to improving deployment agility, they become a foundational component for scaling agent-based systems safely.

Improved security posture

When agents no longer store secrets locally, the attack surface shrinks dramatically. Tokens aren’t hardcoded, logged, or accidentally exposed in CI pipelines. Every access is brokered by the vault, which can enforce rate limits, access scopes, and automatic revocation if an agent is compromised.

Agents become stateless from a secrets perspective, if someone dumps memory or grabs environment variables, they get nothing usable.

In our calendar-syncing agent, a compromised environment wouldn't expose Slack or Google tokens, because they were never stored there to begin with.

Operational simplification

Vaults centralize token logic, storage, refresh, and access rules, so developers don’t need to reinvent credential flows in every agent. This reduces duplication and avoids errors like unhandled expirations or misconfigured scopes.

As a result:

  • New agents can be deployed without provisioning fresh tokens.
  • Expired or rotated tokens don’t require redeployments.
  • Teams can maintain secrets in one place without chasing scattered environment variables.

Built-in audit and access control

Each credential fetch is recorded to a token vault, and they include who fetched it, when, where and what returned. This chain of trail is mandatory in incident response as well as compliance in regulated environments.

Access control policies also ensure agents only request what they need. You can define fine-grained rules such as:

  • Agent A can access Google Calendar tokens but not Slack.
  • Agent B can fetch Notion API keys only during business hours.

This minimizes lateral risk and enforces separation between workflows.

Better developer experience

Most importantly, token vaults remove a class of work developers shouldn’t have to deal with: credential flows. Instead of reading OAuth docs, setting up redirect handlers, and troubleshooting expired tokens, developers write code like this:

const slackToken = await getCredential('slack');

Everything else, including the authentication flow, refresh, and scope handling, is managed behind the scenes by the vault system. This allows developers to focus on workflow logic, rather than integration plumbing.

Choosing a token vault solution

As agents begin interacting with multiple external services, such as Slack, Notion, Gmail, and payment gateways, a token vault transitions from a “nice to have” to critical authentication infrastructure. Choosing the right vault, however, requires careful consideration of architecture fit, extensibility, and operational maturity.

Build vs. buy: What it actually takes

Building your own token vault gives you complete control over how credentials are stored, rotated, and accessed. You can align tightly with internal security tools, custom auth methods, and enterprise identity providers. But it comes with steep costs.

Who has done it?

Netflix, for example, has developed an internal edge authentication service to issue token-agnostic identity payloads at the gateway level. This enables them to integrate tightly with internal authentication protocols and enforce consistent security policies across services.

For most teams, though, this path is resource-heavy. It requires security engineering bandwidth, long-term maintenance, and a deep understanding of protocols such as OpenID Connect, OAuth, and service-to-service authentication.

Key challenges when building your own vault:

  • Security burden: You’re responsible for encryption, auditing, token scoping, rotation, and revocation.
  • OAuth complexity: Handling token refresh flows across third-party APIs is non-trivial and varies by provider.
  • Maintenance overhead: Each new API or service adds new integration points to manage.
  • Compliance gaps: Without proper logging and controls, scaling securely becomes harder under regulatory pressure.

Buying or adopting a solution accelerates time-to-value and plugs you into hardened infrastructure. Managed vaults handle credential storage, expiration, and access control, so your agents just ask for what they need.

Modern vault platforms integrate easily into serverless or containerized environments and expose APIs or SDKs that support secure credential handoffs without duplicating business logic.

What to look for in a token vault

Here’s a concrete checklist to evaluate any vault system:

Parameter
Why it matters
Encryption & storage
Are tokens stored encrypted at rest and in transit? Are secrets isolated per agent or namespace?
Token types
Does it support OAuth access tokens, API keys, and payment token flows? Can it manage refresh tokens automatically?
Authentication methods
Can agents authenticate using OpenID Connect, signed JWTs, mTLS, or other machine-first auth methods?
Access control
Are there granular role-based access controls (RBAC) for agents? Can access be scoped per token or third-party API?
Rotation logic
Does it handle automated token rotation and fallback if a token fails? Is logic decoupled from agent code?
Audit & logging
Can you trace which agent accessed what, when, and why? Are logs exportable for regulatory compliance?
Developer tooling
Is there a CLI, SDK, or RESTful interface? Can you integrate it easily into CI/CD pipelines and cloud runtimes?

Current market landscape

Several tools now serve different parts of the token management and vault ecosystem:

  • Composio.dev: Designed for developer teams building integrations. Provides OAuth handling and secret propagation with a strong UX focus.
  • Arcade.dev: Explicitly built for LLM agents and multi-agent systems, it offers credential brokering and fine-grained permissioning.
  • HashiCorp Vault: Enterprise-grade secrets manager. Extremely powerful, but general-purpose and better suited for infrastructure-level secrets, not agent-specific token lifecycles.
  • Scalekit Agent Connect: A purpose-built vault system for autonomous agents. Handles non-interactive OAuth, scoped credential access, and dynamic token retrieval via drop-in APIs. Tailored for the needs of AI agents operating across third-party APIs.

Purpose-built for agents: Scalekit Agent Connect

Scalekit’s Agent Connect offers a vault system built specifically for autonomous agents. Unlike general-purpose vaults, Agent Connect is designed for agent-first authentication patterns, handling non-interactive OAuth, permission-based credential access, and the secure handoff of short-lived tokens.

Key benefits of Agent Connect include:

  • Seamless integration with agent runtimes and orchestrators
  • OAuth flow handling and token refresh built in
  • Agent-specific access policies and dynamic credential scoping
  • Drop-in APIs for requesting credentials securely at runtime

This approach minimizes integration time, simplifies compliance, and eliminates credential sprawl, making it easier to build and scale multi-service agent systems with confidence.

Getting started

A phased approach to integrating a vault usually looks like this:

  1. Inventory your agent-service integrations: Identify which APIs your agents call and what credentials they need.
  2. Select a vault solution: Evaluate the trade-offs between building in-house and buying a solution based on scale, security requirements, and time-to-market.
  3. Integrate vault access into your agents: Start with read-only credentials, expand into scoped tokens, and auto-rotation.
  4. Gradually deprecate local secrets: Migrate agents off env vars and hardcoded credentials toward fully dynamic auth.

Takeaways: Token vaults are the missing layer for agent systems

Agents can plan, reason, and act, but only if they can securely access the systems on which they depend. From the start, we saw how a simple calendar-to-Slack workflow breaks down due to mismatched auth models. OAuth expects users. API keys sprawl. Secrets get hardcoded. The result is brittle logic, poor security, and workflows that don’t scale.

Token vaults solve this by externalizing credential storage, rotation, and access into a centralized layer. Instead of embedding secrets into every agent, developers configure agents to fetch short-lived tokens from a secure vault. This decouples authentication from agent logic, simplifies auditing, and improves operational hygiene. Agents become stateless. Tokens are scoped. Secrets stay off the wire.

As agent architectures evolve toward multi-service orchestration, vault-backed credentials are no longer just a nice-to-have; they’re foundational infrastructure.

If you're building agent systems that call third-party APIs, interact with payment providers, or rely on secure enterprise access, it’s time to move beyond patchwork auth. Tools like Scalekit Agent Connect offer a vault system purpose-built for agents, with support for non-interactive OAuth, granular access controls, and seamless runtime token delivery.

Try it out, and let your agents focus on what they’re built to do while Scalekit handles the auth method, token lifecycle, and credential complexity under the hood.

FAQ

1. How does a token vault integrate with OAuth for headless AI agents?

A token vault can complete OAuth flows on behalf of agents by handling browser redirects during the initial user consent process. Once tokens are issued, the vault stores and refreshes them automatically, enabling headless agents to access services like Google or Slack without ever touching an auth flow.

2. Can I use a token vault with existing agents running in serverless environments?

Yes. Most modern token vaults expose a secure HTTP API or SDK that agents can call during execution, making them fully compatible with serverless runtimes like AWS Lambda, Google Cloud Functions, or containerized workflows.

3. What is a token vault and why is it important for API security?

A token vault is a centralized service that securely stores and manages API keys, OAuth tokens, and other credentials. It helps improve API security by eliminating hardcoded secrets, supporting automatic token rotation, and enforcing fine-grained access control.

4. How is a token vault different from a secret manager like AWS Secrets Manager or HashiCorp Vault?

While both manage sensitive credentials, a token vault is purpose-built for dynamic token flows, like OAuth access and refresh tokens used by autonomous agents. Traditional secret managers are often static and don’t handle token lifecycles or per-agent permissioning natively.

5. Do I need a token vault to scale multi-agent AI workflows securely?

Yes. As the number of agents and integrated APIs grows, managing credentials manually becomes unscalable and insecure. A token vault provides centralized control, auditability, and automation, enabling the scaling of agent systems without exposing sensitive data.

No items found.
On this page
Share this article
Secure your APIs with OAuth

Acquire enterprise customers with zero upfront cost

Every feature unlocked. No hidden fees.
Start Free
$0
/ month
1 FREE SSO/SCIM connection each
1000 Monthly active users
25 Monthly active organizations
Passwordless auth
API auth: 1000 M2M tokens
MCP auth: 1000 M2M tokens
Agentic Authentication

Token vault: Why it's critical for AI agent workflows

Srinivas Karre

Consider a common agent setup: it reads your Google Calendar to check for upcoming meetings, updates your Slack status to “In a meeting,” and logs notes to Notion. It runs entirely in the cloud, triggered by events, with no user intervention required. Everything works until it tries to authenticate with these services using OAuth and OpenID Connect flows.

Each external service uses its own authentication method, including OAuth flows, OpenID Connect, API keys, or token-based credentials, and nearly all of them assume the presence of an interactive user. But headless agents run in serverless environments or background jobs. These agents don’t have browsers. They can’t complete redirect flows. Worse, they have no secure place to persist credentials.

This forces developers into fragile workarounds, such as hardcoding tokens, injecting secrets through environment variables, or sharing long-lived credentials across agents. These patterns create significant risks, secrets become exposed, tokens expire without notice, and there’s no access visibility or permission separation.

The result is a growing operational and security gap: agents are ready to scale, but their credential management is stuck in a user-centric infrastructure.

The solution is to externalize authentication entirely. A token vault provides a centralized layer where credentials can be securely stored, refreshed, scoped, and audited, allowing agents to request precisely what they need, when they need it, without storing secrets locally or handling authentication flows themselves.

In the rest of this guide, you’ll learn what a token vault is, how it works, why traditional credential handling breaks down in agent workflows, and how to implement a vault-backed authentication layer that scales.

What is a token vault?

A token vault is a secure, centralized service for managing authentication credentials used by AI agents. Instead of embedding secrets directly into each agent, the vault acts as a single source of truth for storing, retrieving, and rotating credentials. Examples of token service providers include general-purpose tools, such as HashiCorp Vault, and agent-first systems, like Scalekit Agent Connect, which broker credentials on demand.

Think of it as a password manager, built not for humans, but for autonomous software.

Core functions of a token vault

A well-designed token vault does more than just store secrets. It becomes the backbone of how agents securely authenticate and operate across services.

Here are the four core capabilities that define an effective token vault:

Core functions of a token vault
  1. Credential storage: OAuth tokens, refresh tokens, API keys, payment tokens, and service credentials are stored securely in a centralized token store with encryption at rest.
  2. Credential retrieval: Agents make authenticated requests to the vault when they need a token, rather than storing secrets locally.
  3. Credential rotation: The vault handles token refresh (e.g., with OAuth refresh tokens) automatically, outside of the agent’s logic.
  4. Auditing and access control: All access is logged. Admins can control which agents can access which credentials, at what scope, and at what frequency.

How vaults replace static tokens

Vault-backed systems replace static tokens with dynamic, policy-controlled access. Here’s how they compare.

Feature
Traditional agent setup
Vault-based setup
Token location
Hardcoded or in environment variables
Stored securely in a centralized vault or token store
Token lifecycle
Static, needs manual refresh
Automatically rotated by the vault
Access permissions
Custom logic (if any)
Role-based, enforced per credential
Observability
No tracking or logging
Full audit trail for every request
Deployment overhead
Tokens are provisioned manually for each agent
Agents fetch what they need dynamically

Example: Agent requesting a credential from a vault API (generic example)

This is a simplified, framework-agnostic example that shows how an agent might request a scoped token from a custom token service provider. The actual implementation will vary depending on the vault system (e.g., HashiCorp Vault, Scalekit Agent Connect, or other OpenID Connect-compatible solutions):

const fetch = require('node-fetch'); async function getSlackToken(agentId, vaultUrl, vaultToken) { const response = await fetch(`${vaultUrl}/v1/agents/${agentId}/credentials/slack`, { headers: { 'Authorization': `Bearer ${vaultToken}` } }); if (!response.ok) { throw new Error(`Failed to fetch token: ${response.statusText}`); } const data = await response.json(); return data.access_token; }

This removes the need for the agent to ever hold or refresh long-lived secrets. The agent just asks the vault when it needs access, keeping authentication decoupled from application logic.

What is traditional credential management?

Traditional credential management refers to the standard patterns developers use to store and provide authentication credentials, like API keys, OAuth tokens, and service secrets, to software applications. This often involves:

  • Hardcoding credentials directly into source code
  • Injecting secrets via environment variables
  • Using shared service accounts or static tokens
  • Manually refreshing and rotating tokens
  • Configuring one-time credentials per service or agent

These patterns were designed for human-managed applications, not autonomous, headless agents that act independently in dynamic environments.

Why traditional credential management fails for agents

Most authentication systems are designed for users, not autonomous software, and expect social and enterprise identity providers to handle interactive auth method flows. This mismatch creates fundamental problems when applied to autonomous agents.

OAuth requires a user in the loop

OAuth2, widely used across APIs like Google, Slack, and Microsoft, assumes there’s a human present to complete a login. Redirects, approval screens, and browser flows are all part of the design. But agents don’t have browsers. They can’t click buttons or grant scopes. This makes standard OAuth integration incompatible out of the box.

Storing long-lived credentials is a security risk

Developers often resort to hardcoded access tokens, static API keys, or refresh tokens stored in environment variables to bypass interactive authentication flows. These secrets are fragile and can easily be leaked. If the agent is compromised, all connected services are also compromised. Worse, secrets may be shared across multiple agents or repos without proper revocation or rotation.

Manual credential management doesn’t scale

Maintaining a consistent and secure credential strategy becomes overwhelming in systems with multiple agents and services. For example, even a simple calendar-to-Slack agent ultimately requires multiple tokens, refresh logic, and error handling across both OAuth and static keys.

  • Each agent needs different tokens, scopes, and lifespans
  • Refresh logic is duplicated or inconsistent across agents
  • Revoking or updating credentials requires code changes or redeployment

Credential sprawl turns agent authentication into an operational bottleneck.

Developers are already struggling with this

One Reddit user summarized the problem succinctly in a recent thread:

Reddit post on how to handle access controls for your AI agents

Their concern? That agents either use full-access user credentials or overprivileged service accounts, with no clean way to scope or audit their access. As they put it, “Enforcing security at the agent layer is inherently risky because of the probabilistic nature of agents.”

That’s exactly the kind of uncontrolled sprawl that token vaults are designed to fix.

No audit trail, no control

Storing tokens inside agent code or configs offers no visibility. There’s no way to track which agent used what credential, when, or how. That becomes a compliance risk, especially in regulated environments, and makes incident response nearly impossible when something goes wrong.

How token vaults solve the agent authentication problem

Token vaults act like a credential concierge for agents. Instead of agents storing, refreshing, and securing credentials themselves, they request them from a centralized, secure service when needed, just like a valet hands you your keys only when it’s time to drive.

This eliminates the need for agents to carry secrets, refresh tokens, or deal with login flows. Developers can keep agent code clean and stateless, with all credential handling abstracted behind a consistent API call.

Centralized credential management

Think of a token vault like a secure locker room for secrets. Instead of handing each agent its own personal locker (and hoping it doesn’t lose the key), you centralize all the keys in one place, under supervision, encrypted, and access-controlled.

The token vault acts as a token store where all service credentials, OAuth tokens, API keys, refresh tokens, and even payment tokens are held securely. Each agent checks in to request the right key at the right time, rather than carrying secrets around.

This eliminates:

  • Secret duplication across agents
  • Insecure storage practices
  • Ad hoc implementations

Access to the vault is governed by well-defined auth methods (e.g., JWTs, client credentials), and all secrets are encrypted at rest. Only verified agents can fetch credentials that they are explicitly allowed to use.

Secure agent authentication

Vault-based authentication is easy to implement with just an HTTP request. Agents don’t need a browser, a login screen, or human involvement. They use automation-friendly auth methods like static credentials, signed JWTs, or mTLS to identify themselves and request tokens.

Here’s a working example using a bearer token to fetch a Slack credential:

const fetch = require('node-fetch'); async function getSlackToken(agentId, vaultUrl, vaultToken) { const res = await fetch(`${vaultUrl}/v1/agents/${agentId}/credentials/slack`, { headers: { 'Authorization': `Bearer ${vaultToken}` } }); if (!res.ok) throw new Error('Failed to fetch credential'); const data = await res.json(); return data.access_token; }

You can implement this in any Node.js agent in under 10 minutes. Just replace agentId, vaultUrl, and vaultToken with your actual values. This pattern works for any third-party API that requires a token, from Slack and Notion to payment processors, without the agent having to store or refresh secrets locally.

Automated credential rotation

Token vaults can automatically refresh credentials—like OAuth access tokens—using stored refresh tokens. This offloads the entire expiration and renewal logic away from the agent. The agent doesn’t track expiry or re-authenticate. It simply requests a valid token when needed, and the vault guarantees that what it returns is always fresh.

This flow is typically handled by a background scheduler process that rotates tokens on a fixed interval. Here's how the rotation process works:

Explaining automated credential rotation

How token rotation works: 

  1. Scheduler triggers the rotation job: A background scheduler (cron job, task runner, etc.) periodically initiates the rotation process.
  2. Vault uses stored refresh token: The vault sends a request to the OAuth provider (e.g., Google, Slack) using the refresh token previously obtained during the OAuth flow.
  3. OAuth provider returns a new access token: The provider validates the refresh token and returns a new access token (sometimes also a new refresh token, depending on the provider).
  4. Vault stores the new token securely: The vault overwrites the old access token in its token store with the fresh one. This ensures that any subsequent agent requests always receive a valid token.
  5. Agents remain stateless and unaware: Since the vault handles rotation behind the scenes, the agent doesn’t know or care when the token expires; it just asks for a token and gets a valid one every time.

For example, a vault might periodically refresh a Google token behind the scenes:

# Example: internal vault refresh process (pseudo-shell) refresh_token() { new_token=$(curl -X POST https://oauth2.googleapis.com/token \ -d client_id=$CLIENT_ID \ -d client_secret=$CLIENT_SECRET \ -d refresh_token=$REFRESH_TOKEN \ -d grant_type=refresh_token) store_in_vault $new_token }

This makes credential handling fully automatic and scalable across hundreds of agents, no more scattered refresh logic or expired tokens breaking production workflows.

Fine-grained permission control

A robust token vault doesn’t just store credentials; it controls who gets access to what. Access policies define exactly which agents can request which credentials and at what level of scope. This enables the separation of responsibilities across workflows and limits the blast radius if any single agent is compromised.

Take the example below. The policy grants agent-42 permission to access two credentials: a read-only Slack token and a calendar token scoped only to read event data.

Example policy structure:

{ "agent_id": "agent-42", "allowed_credentials": ["slack:read", "calendar:events.readonly"] }

When the agent requests access to a credential, the vault first checks this policy. If the request matches one of the allowed scopes, the vault returns a token limited to that scope. If not, it rejects the request.

What happens when an AI agent requests credentials from a vault

The diagram below illustrates this flow. The agent requests a calendar:events.readonly token. The vault checks the agent's policy. If approved, it returns a scoped token. If not, the agent receives an authorization error.

By handling access logic centrally, rather than within each agent, you reduce duplication, enforce least-privilege access, and establish a clear audit trail of every token request.

Token vault in practice

A typical workflow helps illustrate how a token vault works in practice: an AI agent needs to sync a user’s Google Calendar events and update their Slack status based on upcoming meetings.

Step-by-step workflow with a vault

1. Initial authorization flow (One-time, human-initiated): To grant agents access to third-party APIs, the user completes a one-time OAuth flow via a browser. The vault handles this interaction, exchanging the auth code, receiving tokens, and securely storing them tied to the user-agent pair.

The diagram below shows how the vault intermediates between the user and the OAuth provider to complete and store credentials:

how the vault intermediates between the user and the OAuth provider

2. Credentials stored in the vault: The vault now holds a valid Google token (with a refresh token) and a Slack token scoped to update presence. Tokens are encrypted and tied to a specific user-agent relationship.

3. Agent requests access during execution: When the agent runs, it fetches credentials directly from the vault in real time. Tokens are never stored locally; instead, they’re used once and discarded after the task completes.

The flow below shows how an agent authenticates with the vault, receives a scoped token, uses it to call an external API (like updating a Slack status), and then discards it after use:

how an agent authenticates with the vault, receives a scoped token, uses it to call an external API, and then discards it after use

4. Vault returns scoped token: The vault authenticates the agent, checks its permissions, and returns a short-lived, scoped token (e.g., only for reading calendar events or updating presence, not sending messages).

5. Agent executes workflow: With the valid token, the agent reads the calendar, determines when the user is in a meeting, and updates Slack status accordingly. Once done, the token is discarded from memory.

Implementation overview

The vault is usually implemented as a service or deployed self-hosted, or offered as part of a platform, and includes a secure API. It is integrated with the agent through the HTTPS protocol to bearer tokens, signed tokens, or mutual TLS.

For example, an agent might retrieve a calendar credential like this:

const fetch = require('node-fetch'); async function getCalendarToken(agentId, vaultUrl, vaultToken) { const res = await fetch(`${vaultUrl}/v1/agents/${agentId}/credentials/google-calendar`, { headers: { 'Authorization': `Bearer ${vaultToken}` } }); const data = await res.json(); return data.access_token; }

The agent never handles refresh logic or long-term secret storage; it delegates that entirely to the vault.

Integration patterns

There are several ways agents connect to a vault system, depending on the architecture:

  • Direct API access: The agent sends authenticated HTTP requests directly to the vault at runtime.
  • Sidecar process: In some deployments, a lightweight sidecar runs next to the agent. It handles all interactions with the vault, authenticating, retrieving tokens, and injecting them securely into the agent’s runtime. This allows agents to stay fully stateless while offloading credential logic to a dedicated helper process.
  • SDK integration: The vault provides a language-specific SDK that abstracts the API calls and handles token caching, retries, and refresh internally.

These patterns allow vault-based auth to integrate seamlessly with existing agent infrastructure, whether deployed on containers, functions, or edge nodes.

Real-world tools

Several platforms have emerged to solve this exact problem:

  • Composio.dev: Simplifies OAuth flows and secret handling for developer tooling.
  • Arcade.dev: Provides vault-backed credential access optimized for LLM agents.
  • Other emerging solutions: Tailored toward multi-agent orchestration, credential scoping, and managed access.

In all these setups, the core idea remains: agents don’t store credentials, they request them securely, when needed, from a vault that handles everything else.

Key benefits for agent development

Token vaults do more than just secure credentials; they simplify the entire agent development lifecycle. From reducing security risks to improving deployment agility, they become a foundational component for scaling agent-based systems safely.

Improved security posture

When agents no longer store secrets locally, the attack surface shrinks dramatically. Tokens aren’t hardcoded, logged, or accidentally exposed in CI pipelines. Every access is brokered by the vault, which can enforce rate limits, access scopes, and automatic revocation if an agent is compromised.

Agents become stateless from a secrets perspective, if someone dumps memory or grabs environment variables, they get nothing usable.

In our calendar-syncing agent, a compromised environment wouldn't expose Slack or Google tokens, because they were never stored there to begin with.

Operational simplification

Vaults centralize token logic, storage, refresh, and access rules, so developers don’t need to reinvent credential flows in every agent. This reduces duplication and avoids errors like unhandled expirations or misconfigured scopes.

As a result:

  • New agents can be deployed without provisioning fresh tokens.
  • Expired or rotated tokens don’t require redeployments.
  • Teams can maintain secrets in one place without chasing scattered environment variables.

Built-in audit and access control

Each credential fetch is recorded to a token vault, and they include who fetched it, when, where and what returned. This chain of trail is mandatory in incident response as well as compliance in regulated environments.

Access control policies also ensure agents only request what they need. You can define fine-grained rules such as:

  • Agent A can access Google Calendar tokens but not Slack.
  • Agent B can fetch Notion API keys only during business hours.

This minimizes lateral risk and enforces separation between workflows.

Better developer experience

Most importantly, token vaults remove a class of work developers shouldn’t have to deal with: credential flows. Instead of reading OAuth docs, setting up redirect handlers, and troubleshooting expired tokens, developers write code like this:

const slackToken = await getCredential('slack');

Everything else, including the authentication flow, refresh, and scope handling, is managed behind the scenes by the vault system. This allows developers to focus on workflow logic, rather than integration plumbing.

Choosing a token vault solution

As agents begin interacting with multiple external services, such as Slack, Notion, Gmail, and payment gateways, a token vault transitions from a “nice to have” to critical authentication infrastructure. Choosing the right vault, however, requires careful consideration of architecture fit, extensibility, and operational maturity.

Build vs. buy: What it actually takes

Building your own token vault gives you complete control over how credentials are stored, rotated, and accessed. You can align tightly with internal security tools, custom auth methods, and enterprise identity providers. But it comes with steep costs.

Who has done it?

Netflix, for example, has developed an internal edge authentication service to issue token-agnostic identity payloads at the gateway level. This enables them to integrate tightly with internal authentication protocols and enforce consistent security policies across services.

For most teams, though, this path is resource-heavy. It requires security engineering bandwidth, long-term maintenance, and a deep understanding of protocols such as OpenID Connect, OAuth, and service-to-service authentication.

Key challenges when building your own vault:

  • Security burden: You’re responsible for encryption, auditing, token scoping, rotation, and revocation.
  • OAuth complexity: Handling token refresh flows across third-party APIs is non-trivial and varies by provider.
  • Maintenance overhead: Each new API or service adds new integration points to manage.
  • Compliance gaps: Without proper logging and controls, scaling securely becomes harder under regulatory pressure.

Buying or adopting a solution accelerates time-to-value and plugs you into hardened infrastructure. Managed vaults handle credential storage, expiration, and access control, so your agents just ask for what they need.

Modern vault platforms integrate easily into serverless or containerized environments and expose APIs or SDKs that support secure credential handoffs without duplicating business logic.

What to look for in a token vault

Here’s a concrete checklist to evaluate any vault system:

Parameter
Why it matters
Encryption & storage
Are tokens stored encrypted at rest and in transit? Are secrets isolated per agent or namespace?
Token types
Does it support OAuth access tokens, API keys, and payment token flows? Can it manage refresh tokens automatically?
Authentication methods
Can agents authenticate using OpenID Connect, signed JWTs, mTLS, or other machine-first auth methods?
Access control
Are there granular role-based access controls (RBAC) for agents? Can access be scoped per token or third-party API?
Rotation logic
Does it handle automated token rotation and fallback if a token fails? Is logic decoupled from agent code?
Audit & logging
Can you trace which agent accessed what, when, and why? Are logs exportable for regulatory compliance?
Developer tooling
Is there a CLI, SDK, or RESTful interface? Can you integrate it easily into CI/CD pipelines and cloud runtimes?

Current market landscape

Several tools now serve different parts of the token management and vault ecosystem:

  • Composio.dev: Designed for developer teams building integrations. Provides OAuth handling and secret propagation with a strong UX focus.
  • Arcade.dev: Explicitly built for LLM agents and multi-agent systems, it offers credential brokering and fine-grained permissioning.
  • HashiCorp Vault: Enterprise-grade secrets manager. Extremely powerful, but general-purpose and better suited for infrastructure-level secrets, not agent-specific token lifecycles.
  • Scalekit Agent Connect: A purpose-built vault system for autonomous agents. Handles non-interactive OAuth, scoped credential access, and dynamic token retrieval via drop-in APIs. Tailored for the needs of AI agents operating across third-party APIs.

Purpose-built for agents: Scalekit Agent Connect

Scalekit’s Agent Connect offers a vault system built specifically for autonomous agents. Unlike general-purpose vaults, Agent Connect is designed for agent-first authentication patterns, handling non-interactive OAuth, permission-based credential access, and the secure handoff of short-lived tokens.

Key benefits of Agent Connect include:

  • Seamless integration with agent runtimes and orchestrators
  • OAuth flow handling and token refresh built in
  • Agent-specific access policies and dynamic credential scoping
  • Drop-in APIs for requesting credentials securely at runtime

This approach minimizes integration time, simplifies compliance, and eliminates credential sprawl, making it easier to build and scale multi-service agent systems with confidence.

Getting started

A phased approach to integrating a vault usually looks like this:

  1. Inventory your agent-service integrations: Identify which APIs your agents call and what credentials they need.
  2. Select a vault solution: Evaluate the trade-offs between building in-house and buying a solution based on scale, security requirements, and time-to-market.
  3. Integrate vault access into your agents: Start with read-only credentials, expand into scoped tokens, and auto-rotation.
  4. Gradually deprecate local secrets: Migrate agents off env vars and hardcoded credentials toward fully dynamic auth.

Takeaways: Token vaults are the missing layer for agent systems

Agents can plan, reason, and act, but only if they can securely access the systems on which they depend. From the start, we saw how a simple calendar-to-Slack workflow breaks down due to mismatched auth models. OAuth expects users. API keys sprawl. Secrets get hardcoded. The result is brittle logic, poor security, and workflows that don’t scale.

Token vaults solve this by externalizing credential storage, rotation, and access into a centralized layer. Instead of embedding secrets into every agent, developers configure agents to fetch short-lived tokens from a secure vault. This decouples authentication from agent logic, simplifies auditing, and improves operational hygiene. Agents become stateless. Tokens are scoped. Secrets stay off the wire.

As agent architectures evolve toward multi-service orchestration, vault-backed credentials are no longer just a nice-to-have; they’re foundational infrastructure.

If you're building agent systems that call third-party APIs, interact with payment providers, or rely on secure enterprise access, it’s time to move beyond patchwork auth. Tools like Scalekit Agent Connect offer a vault system purpose-built for agents, with support for non-interactive OAuth, granular access controls, and seamless runtime token delivery.

Try it out, and let your agents focus on what they’re built to do while Scalekit handles the auth method, token lifecycle, and credential complexity under the hood.

FAQ

1. How does a token vault integrate with OAuth for headless AI agents?

A token vault can complete OAuth flows on behalf of agents by handling browser redirects during the initial user consent process. Once tokens are issued, the vault stores and refreshes them automatically, enabling headless agents to access services like Google or Slack without ever touching an auth flow.

2. Can I use a token vault with existing agents running in serverless environments?

Yes. Most modern token vaults expose a secure HTTP API or SDK that agents can call during execution, making them fully compatible with serverless runtimes like AWS Lambda, Google Cloud Functions, or containerized workflows.

3. What is a token vault and why is it important for API security?

A token vault is a centralized service that securely stores and manages API keys, OAuth tokens, and other credentials. It helps improve API security by eliminating hardcoded secrets, supporting automatic token rotation, and enforcing fine-grained access control.

4. How is a token vault different from a secret manager like AWS Secrets Manager or HashiCorp Vault?

While both manage sensitive credentials, a token vault is purpose-built for dynamic token flows, like OAuth access and refresh tokens used by autonomous agents. Traditional secret managers are often static and don’t handle token lifecycles or per-agent permissioning natively.

5. Do I need a token vault to scale multi-agent AI workflows securely?

Yes. As the number of agents and integrated APIs grows, managing credentials manually becomes unscalable and insecure. A token vault provides centralized control, auditability, and automation, enabling the scaling of agent systems without exposing sensitive data.

No items found.
Ship Enterprise Auth in days